#Webstorm 2016 license server android
#Webstorm 2016 license server code
#Webstorm 2016 license server free

#Webstorm 2016 license server code

Unfortunately, VS Code is not that powerful at the moment. The IDE will first search for usages of the files and if they are found, you can check them and make necessary before the files are deleted. Using this functionality you can safely remove files from your source code during refactoring. In general, all the JetBrains IDEs are well known for their refactoring features:Ī well-known feature of the JetBrain IDEs is Safe Delete. You can rename a component and it updates all file names and usages both in the HTML as well as in the TypeScript files. In my opinion, refactoring code is much better using WebStorm. Using WebStorm you already have everything available per-default and, for example, for Angular just need to click 'Debug Application' and you can set breakpoints in the editor and watch variables etc. VS Code can only debug web application on Chrome by using the Debugger For Chrome extension which you then need to configure for your application. This can be useful if you, for example, did a git push force by accident and overwrite your files even on the remote branch. You can inspect the history of files and directories and do rollbacks. WebStorm automatically tracks all the changes you made to your files and therefore protects you from accidentally losing these changes. VS Code does not save a local history of your changes but you can use extensions like Local History. You can commit files, review changes, and resolve conflicts with a visual diff/merge tool right in the IDE. WebStorm provides all the functionality for complex git work out of the box. You can either use extensions like GitLens or use additional tools like Sourcetree if you like to use a GUI for complex git work. VS Code has per default a pretty basic git integration. VS Code has currently no possibility to show this information: WebStorm shows if there are unresolved promises (in this case for a TypeScript application): Not waiting for promises can be really tricky if you expect the subsequent code to run only after the promise has been resolved. There is currently also a VS Code Karma Test Adapter in development which should provide a similar integrated Karma test functionality for VS Code. Alternatively, I use the karma-jasmine-html-reporter where you can also define to run only certain tests by clicking on them in the HTML page. fdescribe) which tells Karma to only run this certain test block. My Angular unit test workflow in VS Code is normally to mark a describe or it test block with a f (e.g. The following image shows such a test run: Running my jasmine & Karma tests in WebStorm I can easily jump to the failed test code and rerun only this specific test. This way you can run your tests directly from the IDE and even debug them there. WebStorm has an integrated test runner which I really like. This was basically what convinced me that using WebStorm results in a cleaner code base. To see the difference open your project which was developed in VS Code with WebStorm and run the code inspection.

This can have a huge impact on the code quality of a large Angular code base which was mainly developed using VS Code. But if you are, for example, using a TypeScript project (like Angular) VS Code does not detect unused public methods. You can also detect unused methods in JavaScript methods using VS Code and ESLint with the rules no-unused-vars and no-unreachable. It also indexes your whole project and can, for example, detect all unused methods, variables and more. This analysis detects language and runtime errors, suggests corrections and improvements. WebStorm provides a robust, fast, and flexible static code analysis. In the following article, I talk about my experience using WebStorm in a large Angular application which was mainly developed in VS Code. This is a very hot topic and I know this will cause some controversy. In this blog post, I want to tell you why I now mainly use WebStorm instead of VS Code for development. First, I did not really consider his concerns but meanwhile, I understand him. In my current project, I met a developer who was really confused that I was using an editor and not an IDE for the development of large business applications.

#Webstorm 2016 license server free

I really liked it because it was much faster, highly customizable and free so that I could also use it for my private projects. Additionally, I got a WebStorm license from my company and could, therefore, use it without any restrictions.Īs Visual Studio Code got more and more popular I used it for my further web projects.

#Webstorm 2016 license server android

I was already used to JetBrains IDEs as I worked before with Android Studio which is based on IntelliJ IDEA. As I started my first JavaScript project in 2015 I used JetBrains WebStorm which is an IDE (integrated development environment) for JavaScript development.